AI Agents in Operations: Practical Automation
# AI Agents in Operations: Practical Automation
I've been building AI agents as personal projects — using crewAI for Python-based custom agents and Lindy for agent orchestration. The hype around AI agents is enormous. The practical applications are more limited, but genuinely valuable when done right.
Starting with Real Problems
The temptation with AI agents is to build impressive demos. Agents that can browse the web, write code, and compose emails — all in one flow. It looks magical in a video.
In practice, I've found the most useful agents are boringly specific:
CrewAI for Customization
When I need precise control over agent behavior, crewAI is my go-to. Python-based means I can integrate with existing systems, add custom logic, and debug when things go wrong.
The key insight from building with crewAI: agents are only as good as their tools. Giving an agent access to the right APIs, the right data sources, the right output channels — that's where the real work is.
The agent itself is often the easy part.
Lindy for Orchestration
Lindy approaches the problem differently — it's about orchestrating agents without deep technical setup. For operations workflows where speed matters more than customization, it's powerful.
I've used Lindy for:
Operations as the Ideal Use Case
Why operations? Because operations work is:
The Human Loop
Every agent workflow I build has human checkpoints. Not because the AI can't be trusted, but because operations reality is messier than any model can capture.
The goal isn't full automation. It's intelligent assistance. Agents handle the 80%, humans handle the 20% that requires judgment. That's where the leverage is.
Previous
From Founder to PM: The Mindset Shift
Next
Building Products Across Cultures: A Multilingual Perspective

Amon skipped presentations and built real AI products.
Amon Fayz was part of the September 2025 cohort at Curious PM, alongside 13 other talented participants.
